Comments on: Chris Ware’s Unmasked

By: Marcos Mateu

Marcos Mateu — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:54:06 +0000

Fantastic cover.

By: Antione

Antione — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:22:22 +0000

I agree it is hard to read. But I am still impressed with his speed of doing art work that’s not bad. Maybe if he made it a bit bigger it might get a little more love.

By: Antione

Antione — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:38:53 +0000

Hmmm… I won’t be as hard on his work as the others. I’m still impressed by the speed I can finish his work and not have it look to bad. But he may want to make it bigger. To many times online comic make their font to small to read.

By: bill

bill — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:40:57 +0000

I’m going to agree with Charley on this. If the point were to make a completely legible line by line story Mr. Ware would choose a different medium. One of the great things about his work is that people always talk about it, positive or negative. I enjoy things, particularly in the illustration and comics world, that push us to question and ask questions about why while still telling a story and engaging us.

By: Charley Parker

Charley Parker — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:13:45 +0000

Thanks, Daniel.

Your point is taken about the size of type and panels, but I would be equally impressed if he told a short story in 8 pages. The small elements seem to be part of his overall fascination with detail. The qualities I find most appealing in his work are those that evidence restraint, in color, drawing style and storytelling, in a medium which seems largely based on the absence of restraint.

By: Daniel van Benthuysen

Daniel van Benthuysen — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:03:07 +0000

For this reader, his graphic style falls noticeably short of sublime. Whether Ware is typesetting his text or hand-lettering it, I can’t quite tell. What I do know is that his text is frustratingly difficult on my middle-aged eyes (even with recently adjusted perscription lenses.)

As near as I can tell, his text is the equivalent of about 7 point type. Most magazines like the New Yorker use 9 point type for body copy. Where the New Yorker text might get 7 lines of type in the depth of an inch, Ware squeezes 12 lines. It’s not completely illegible but it’s slow going and frustrating enough that I’ve never made it more than a quarter of the way through anything of his that I’ve encountered. And the type is not just small, it’s too thin in weight.

Maybe he’s content with a younger audience whose vision is closer to perfect. But he’s unlikely to hang on to those readers as they age.

Perhaps my frustration with his text also explains why I’m not so impressed that he manages to get a complete story into four pages. He could adopt a microfilm format and get it all into a single page… thereby losing even more readers.