<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norman Rockwell: Behind the Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:01:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel van Benthuysen</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842522</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel van Benthuysen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842522</guid>
		<description>The irony in this picture is that a barbershop quartet is usually understood to mean an a cappella group. Rockwell was pulling a bit of a visual joke on us here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony in this picture is that a barbershop quartet is usually understood to mean an a cappella group. Rockwell was pulling a bit of a visual joke on us here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842492</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842492</guid>
		<description>Could be a whole fiddler&#039;s convention in there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be a whole fiddler&#8217;s convention in there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dubé</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842453</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842453</guid>
		<description>LOL. Speaking of composing images, do you suppose that the fourth member of the Barbershop Quartet is behind the curtain (wall)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Speaking of composing images, do you suppose that the fourth member of the Barbershop Quartet is behind the curtain (wall)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dubé</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842451</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842451</guid>
		<description>After reading the other comments, especially Mike Burke&#039;s, I&#039;m torn. I really admired Rockwell, I knew that he used photographs (which he staged), and that he chose friends and neighbors for his characterizations. I don&#039;t fault him for doing it, just as I wouldn&#039;t fault Maxfield Parrish for stacking a bunch of rocks on a sheet of glass, pouring sand over them, aiming a floodlight at his &#039;composition&#039; and then taking a photograph - all before touching canvas with the first layer of glaze. They&#039;re tools. I use them - every artist I know uses tools of some kind (even the PleinAirPeople). I LIKE looking behind the curtain. I LIKE asking the question - how did he do that - and then getting a real answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the other comments, especially Mike Burke&#8217;s, I&#8217;m torn. I really admired Rockwell, I knew that he used photographs (which he staged), and that he chose friends and neighbors for his characterizations. I don&#8217;t fault him for doing it, just as I wouldn&#8217;t fault Maxfield Parrish for stacking a bunch of rocks on a sheet of glass, pouring sand over them, aiming a floodlight at his &#8216;composition&#8217; and then taking a photograph &#8211; all before touching canvas with the first layer of glaze. They&#8217;re tools. I use them &#8211; every artist I know uses tools of some kind (even the PleinAirPeople). I LIKE looking behind the curtain. I LIKE asking the question &#8211; how did he do that &#8211; and then getting a real answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonya</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842392</link>
		<dc:creator>nonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842392</guid>
		<description>I have never believed that using images to draw or paint or sculpt from is cheating in anyway. Even if you are trying to replicate that image it still has the hand of the artist that is recreating that scene in 2D or 3D. I think that most of the images that I have drawn in the last few years have been from photographs. Norman Rockwell knew how beneficial it could be to use a photo and it shows in his masterpieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never believed that using images to draw or paint or sculpt from is cheating in anyway. Even if you are trying to replicate that image it still has the hand of the artist that is recreating that scene in 2D or 3D. I think that most of the images that I have drawn in the last few years have been from photographs. Norman Rockwell knew how beneficial it could be to use a photo and it shows in his masterpieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842174</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842174</guid>
		<description>Yes. I agree that for those not interested in this particular aspect of Rockwell&#039;s process, it could be less than fascinating, and like having a stage magician reveal his secrets, leave the viewer with a diminution of the original effect. I like your comparison to recut movies using sound stage footage with no effects or score. Some would find this fascinating, others would find the charm gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I agree that for those not interested in this particular aspect of Rockwell&#8217;s process, it could be less than fascinating, and like having a stage magician reveal his secrets, leave the viewer with a diminution of the original effect. I like your comparison to recut movies using sound stage footage with no effects or score. Some would find this fascinating, others would find the charm gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842124</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you post this. I saw a copy of the book in a local store the other day and I came away from it with mixed feelings. As an artist, I&#039;m interested in methods and techniques used by other artists - and I had known that Rockwell used photographs - but this book left me less than excited.

True, it is interesting seeing his source material and get a feel for his choices and working process, but still there is something about what this book - and exhibit I guess - does to works that I grew up looking at. Norman Rockwell, Robert McCall and Pierre Joubert were three artists who caught my attention in my youth and I can&#039;t help feeling a fondness for some of their works. I&#039;m sure others reading this could cite their own list and - I can tell while writing this that I&#039;m having trouble expressing this, so let me try a different approach.

Imagine hearing about a &#039;special anniversary edition&#039; of either The Wizard of Oz or Star Wars. (you choose) You sit down and look at it only to find that many scenes have been re-cut to utilize only the sound stage footage without the special effects and score. A film student may love it but a fan of the movie may be disappointed.

I&#039;m not saying &#039;Don&#039;t look at this book&#039; or &#039;Don&#039;t go to the exhibit.&#039; I&#039;m just saying that you should be prepared for how your feelings toward the &#039;finished&#039; piece can taint your reaction to this material.

Then again, maybe I&#039;m the only one to come away with that reaction. Maybe it was just the starkness of some of the photographs because I&#039;ve never been bothered by seeing preliminary drawings, color studies or master drawings compared to finished pieces. Or, maybe it is just because I did grow up admiring Rockwell&#039;s work and I just don&#039;t want to see the man behind this curtain.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you post this. I saw a copy of the book in a local store the other day and I came away from it with mixed feelings. As an artist, I&#8217;m interested in methods and techniques used by other artists &#8211; and I had known that Rockwell used photographs &#8211; but this book left me less than excited.</p>
<p>True, it is interesting seeing his source material and get a feel for his choices and working process, but still there is something about what this book &#8211; and exhibit I guess &#8211; does to works that I grew up looking at. Norman Rockwell, Robert McCall and Pierre Joubert were three artists who caught my attention in my youth and I can&#8217;t help feeling a fondness for some of their works. I&#8217;m sure others reading this could cite their own list and &#8211; I can tell while writing this that I&#8217;m having trouble expressing this, so let me try a different approach.</p>
<p>Imagine hearing about a &#8216;special anniversary edition&#8217; of either The Wizard of Oz or Star Wars. (you choose) You sit down and look at it only to find that many scenes have been re-cut to utilize only the sound stage footage without the special effects and score. A film student may love it but a fan of the movie may be disappointed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying &#8216;Don&#8217;t look at this book&#8217; or &#8216;Don&#8217;t go to the exhibit.&#8217; I&#8217;m just saying that you should be prepared for how your feelings toward the &#8216;finished&#8217; piece can taint your reaction to this material.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe I&#8217;m the only one to come away with that reaction. Maybe it was just the starkness of some of the photographs because I&#8217;ve never been bothered by seeing preliminary drawings, color studies or master drawings compared to finished pieces. Or, maybe it is just because I did grow up admiring Rockwell&#8217;s work and I just don&#8217;t want to see the man behind this curtain.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dubé</title>
		<link>http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-842119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linesandcolors.com/2009/12/07/norman-rockwell-behind-the-camera/#comment-842119</guid>
		<description>Speaking of moving pictures, have you ever seen this movie? http://www.ubu.com/film/calder.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of moving pictures, have you ever seen this movie? <a href="http://www.ubu.com/film/calder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubu.com/film/calder.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

